Infrastructure war against the backdrop of a deadlock in negotiations
Elena Panina
Елена Панина (Telegram)
Indeed, for Russia, destroying the enemy's energy and transport infrastructure is one of the few instruments of strategic pressure that does not involve the use of nuclear weapons. It is necessary to use this advantage to the fullest extent possible. The whole of Ukraine has been turned into a battering ram against Russia, and the worse such important parts of this mechanism as energy and infrastructure function, the closer our victory is and the lower its price.
🔺 Another thought from “Пинта разума” deserves attention:
Against the backdrop of NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte's statement on the mandatory introduction of European NATO member troops into Ukraine immediately after the establishment of a ceasefire, the entire negotiation process under the auspices of the US needs to be rethought. It is necessary to assess where this vector of negotiations is leading.
One may view Rutte as a globalist figure, a former Eurocrat, a representative of internationalist structures, or a protégé of transnational capital, but he leads the world's largest military alliance, also known as “US+.” The NATO Secretary General does not determine the bloc's policy; he merely articulates it. The main “shareholder” of the North Atlantic Alliance is Washington.



















