1/7 🚨 BREAKING: The U.S. State Department just filed a sworn record in federal court calling the UK-based Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) and its CEO Imran Ahmed 'a key collaborator with the Biden administration on weaponizing the national security bureaucracy to… pic.twitter.com/rpdX1ouWWp

— Sayer Ji (@sayerjigmi) February 11, 2026

Sayer Ji | If the government can work with a foreign organization to put your name on a list, pressure Silicon Valley to erase you from the internet, and then tell a court that nobody coordinated anything — and get away with it — then every American's right to speak freely is a permission slip that can be revoked the moment your views become inconvenient. On February 6, 2026, a certified State Department filing proved that is exactly what happened to us. And unless this case succeeds, there is nothing stopping it from happening to you. ■ For five years, my co-plaintiffs and I have maintained that the Center for Countering Digital Hate did not simply publish a report about us and walk away. We have maintained that CCDH actively collaborated with government officials and pressured technology platforms to censor, deplatform, and demonetize us. We have maintained that the so-called “Disinformation Dozen” campaign was not organic public discourse but a coordinated operation involving a foreign-led advocacy organization, the White House, and the most powerful technology companies in the world. ■ On February 6, 2026, the United States Department of State confirmed it. In a certified administrative record filed in the Southern District of New York, the executive branch formally characterized CCDH’s CEO Imran Ahmed as “a key collaborator with the Biden administration on weaponizing the national security bureaucracy to censor U.S. citizens and pressure U.S. companies into censoring.” That is not our allegation. That is the government’s own finding—entered into the federal record, certified under penalty of perjury, and signed personally by the Secretary of State.

■ The Switchboard: From Epstein to Mandelson to McSweeney to Ahmed — How a British Machine Became America's Censorship Engine (02/09/26)
■ Inside Project Molecule — How JPMorgan and the Gates Foundation Turned Biology into Investable Infrastructure (02/09/26)
■ BREAKING: The Epstein Files Illuminate a 20-Year Architecture Behind Pandemics as a Business Model—With Bill Gates at the Center of the Network (02/09/26)

Migration Watch UK | Introduction | 1. Since the late 1990s, net migration to the UK has been rising and records regularly broken. The high-water mark was 745,000 in 2022 (originally reported by the Office for National Statistics as 606,000). The charts and table in this revamped tracker will automatically update every day in the late afternoon. What is net migration? | 2. Net migration is the difference between the number of people who have come to Britain (immigrants), and those who have left (emigrants). If the number of immigrants was equivalent to the number of emigrants, net migration would be net zero. The last time net migration to the UK was that low was 1993, before which net migration had periodically fallen below zero, resulting in a net outflow of people to which the emigration of British nationals made a significant contribution. How has the make-up of migrants changed? | 3. Post-2004, immigration from Eastern and Central Europe considerably increased immigration from the European Union, prior to this it had been comparatively low. However, It wasn't until 2012 that EU migration started outstripping non-EU migration. 4. Chart 2 reveals that from 2010 to 2019, major immigration to the UK came from the European Union. After Brexit, EU immigration to the UK declined. In 2022, Chart 3 indicates a shift – out of 1.3 million visas, only 47,000 went to EU nationals. Meanwhile, migration from South and East Asia increased significantly, with noticeable rises from the Middle East and Sub-Saharan Africa, albeit to a lesser degree.