Alberta, Canada: Scathing Review Of The Pandemic Policy - Part 2
Terje Hansen
Foreningen Lov og Helse
In January this year, a report was released that evaluated Canada's handling of the so-called Covid-19 (C19) pandemic. The full report is 269 pages long and can be read here.
In Part 1, I showed some of the evaluation reports commissioned by the health authorities in the Province of Alberta in Canada. This report concluded with a rather scathing review of the authorities' C19 policy. Canadian statistician Regina Watteel has discussed the report. She also offers some criticism of the report, focusing on certain shortcomings it has. Dr. Watteel highlights several fairly important elements that I will address below. Among other things, she points out that:
The all-important question regarding the implication of failing to clean up what happened is raised by Dr. Watteel quite precisely:
What she points out here is important; that there are broadly speaking no consequences for committing such crimes. This is the same freedom from consequences I briefly mentioned in the article about Dag-Inge Ulstein. Norway seems to be a world leader in this respect.
Dr. Watteel is at it again when she describes the so-called pandemic as a phenomenon:
1. The “trust the science” concept: which was a system of deception with statistics that should be presented to the public,
2. The communication strategy: The use of censorship, propaganda, and malignant behavioral psychology techniques (psychological warfare - my comment),
3. The collusive judiciary: turning a blind eye to massive breaches of the law while refusing to see evidence that went against their personal and political ideology.
Dr. Watteel points to what she believes is perhaps the biggest technical shortcoming of the Alberta report:
1. Propaganda,
2. Justification for unconstitutional measures, and
3. Statistics was a way for governments to evade accountability.
We at Lov og Helse have also pointed this out for Norway in several articles showing how Norwegian authorities have done the same with their statistics operation, for example in here, here, and here.
Dr. Watteel points out further shortcomings in the Alberta report:
2. Secondly, although the report mentions COVID-19 testing, it does not discuss how testing can be manipulated to increase or decrease the number of reported cases.
3. Nor does it discuss the unreliability of Covid-19 statistics.
At the end of his review, Dr. Watteel addresses some essential issues, highlighting this fundamental and almost philosophical consideration:
And finally, she points out the most central pillar of the method used in the warfare against the population that the so-called pandemic represents:
We have also written about what she says about the role of the media previously. Furthermore, Dr. Watteel discusses perhaps the most important topic of all - censorship. The enormous Western censorship complex, of which the so-called "fact-checking" industry is a central pillar, was crucial to the course of the pandemic. Naturally, this is also the reason why Norwegian authorities had an almost allergic reaction when Meta/Facebook suddenly indicated that they were going to discontinue (some) of this censorship.
In this sense, almost everything in this case, as well as almost all other sub-problems, boils down to a single point: the importance of fighting against Western and Norwegian authorities' increasingly frenetic attempts to achieve full information control all 1984 and further introduction of censorship.
Translation: DeepL (free version) + Grammarly (free version)
____________________________________________________________________________________________
AWIP: https://a-w-i-p.com/index.php/2025/03/11/alberta-canada-scathing-review-of